Another poaching newspaper clipping:
This from yesterday's Daily mail in case you didn't see it. Making the news but any action -we shall see.
The River
Wye at Tintern Abbey was Britain’s first beauty spot to be acclaimed, with the
great and good of Georgian society flocking to a place where William Wordsworth
waxed lyrical about ‘These waters, rolling from their mountain-springs, With a
soft inland murmur’.
Today, the 250-year-old tourist attraction still draws
tens of thousands of walkers, canoeists, and sightseers each summer.
Most tour the Wye Valley, an area of outstanding natural
beauty which has in recent times provided scenic filming locations for many
movies as well as the modish TV programme Sex Education.
The putrid
spectacle is known as an ‘algal bloom’. This tends to erupt during periods of
dry weather and bright sunshine. It prevents light from reaching aquatic
plants, which wither and die, and reduces oxygen levels so the river becomes
toxic for fish
Yet if
modern sightseers expect to encounter Wordsworth’s ‘sylvan Wye’, or take in
local views that were dubbed a ‘Godly scene’ by his chum Samuel Taylor
Coleridge, they may end up disappointed.
Why so? Well, recent summers have seen the usually
gin-clear river filled with thick green algae for weeks and sometimes months on
end.
The putrid spectacle is known as an ‘algal bloom’. This
tends to erupt during periods of dry weather and bright sunshine.
It prevents light from reaching aquatic plants, which
wither and die, and reduces oxygen levels so the river becomes toxic for fish.
I encountered one such ‘bloom’ earlier this month when I
walked along a stretch of the river near Redbrook, a couple of miles from my
home in Monmouthshire.
The water, in which you can usually see shoals of minnow
and the occasional trout, resembled pea soup. Gravel beds were covered with a
thick, slimy gunk. The air smelled salty and unpleasant, like a seaside harbour
at low tide.
This distressing spectacle continued for mile after meandering
mile. And this week, I discovered what may very well have been to blame.
A startling report from a conservation body called the
Wye & Usk Foundation [WUF] claims that the ‘ecological disaster’ of algal
blooms facing ‘Britain’s favourite river’ is an unexpected by-product of our
growing appetite for free-range eggs.
The foundation says that recent years have seen a
dramatic expansion of chicken farming in rural Powys, where the headwaters of
the Wye and its tributaries can be found.
This, it contends, is responsible for high levels of
phosphates entering the river and fuelling the blooms.
All of which highlights an awkward fact: that while we
may like to kid ourselves that expensive free-range eggs are laid by small flocks
which roam grassy fields, the reality is that almost all those we buy come from
vast Intensive Poultry Units (IPUs).
These huge egg factories, which in Powys contain up to
64,000 birds each, consist of a large warehouse-like barn where the chickens roost
at night and lay eggs by day, and an outdoor ‘range’ where they roam en masse.
After being taken to an IPU, each bird lays just over 300
eggs in roughly an 18-month period. Then the entire flock is slaughtered and
replaced.
Crucially, the IPUs which now dot much of the landscape
in Powys, from where a hefty portion of the nation’s eggs now come, also happen
to produce unbelievable quantities of chicken manure.
In fact, for every thousand chickens on a particular
site, you’ll around get half a ton of the stuff every month.
A 64,000-bird IPU will therefore churn out upwards of 300
tons a year. Crucially, chicken poo is rich in phosphorous and nitrates, and a
good portion of it will find its way into local streams and rivers.
Pictures on the WUF’s website to this end show rivers of
effluent washing into streams from farmland.
‘Chickens make two things: eggs and excrement,’ is how
Simon Evans, the Foundation’s CEO puts it.
‘With free-range birds, some of the excrement goes
straight from the chicken onto the land. The rest they produce in barns, where
it is then usually collected up and spread on the surrounding fields as a form
of fertiliser.
‘When there are only a few farms, that’s totally fine.
But the number of farms in Powys has just exploded.
‘There are now 109 chicken units around the headwaters of
the Wye. There were just three in 2009. You cannot load up a catchment area
with this much phosphate and not expect it to have an effect. It will kill your
river.’
The sheer scale of poultry farming in this large but
thinly populated Welsh county certainly beggars belief.
According to the Campaign for the Protection of Rural
Wales [CPRW], 137 planning applications for IPUs were approved by the county
council in the past five years, and four last month. A further 23 are in the
pipeline, for units that will each hold between 12,000 and 150,000 birds.
Since 2001, the total capacity of IPUs in Powys has grown
from 128,000 to a staggering 9,921,499 hens, and has doubled in the past five
years. There are now 76 chickens for every person that lives there.
Not all of the birds are laying free-range eggs, of
course. In fact, many of the larger IPUs contain so-called ‘broiler’ hens which
are slaughtered for meat at roughly 40 days old and taken to Hereford for
processing. But they all eat food, and produce manure, in unprecedented
volumes.
‘The sheer
numbers of chickens just don’t add up if you want to keep rivers clean,’ says
Evans.
‘Take the River Ithon, which is a tributary of the Wye,
upstream of Llanbister. It’s a beautiful place, a special area for
conservation, and although fewer than a hundred people live there, you’ve now
got 20 chicken sheds. It’s a crime.’
The Wye isn’t the only river in the firing line: Powys
also contains catchment areas for the Severn and Usk, two of Britain’s other
great rivers, along with the Towy, once a renowned sea trout river.
Spreading excess manure on grassland anywhere in the UK
is perfectly legal, provided farmers follow specific guidelines.
However, Christine Hugh-Jones, local secretary of the
CPRW, points out that ‘in our steep Welsh valleys, where there’s often not a
huge amount of vegetation, it easily gets washed off, pouring into rivers
whenever there are storms.’ And in Powys it rains an awful lot.
Phosphates that enter these upper reaches of the Wye have
a particularly devastating effect, conservationists argue, because they allow
algal blooms to sub-divide eight or nine times by the time they reach the Wye
Valley, some 140 miles downstream.
Historically, algal blooms would start around Hereford,
and last for a day or two. Now they begin twice as far upstream and can choke
the river for weeks on end. In last summer’s heatwave, one lasted for almost
two months.
The knock-on effects have been most keenly felt by anglers.
The Wye was once the UK’s most productive salmon river outside Scotland.
In the heyday of the 1960s and 70s, monster fish weighing
30 or 40lb and 4ft in length were regularly caught, and in the 1980s, the river
produced up to 6,000 salmon annually.
By contrast, 2019 saw the Wye’s worst ever fishing
season, with just 340 landed (all of them were returned so they could continue
their journey upstream to spawn).
Salmon populations are declining everywhere, of course,
and it’s foolish to blame any single factor for their demise. But when a
species is on the brink, every additional threat causes real damage.
‘The blooms started 10 to 15 years ago,’ says Adam
Fisher, a professional guide who runs the Angling Dreams fishing store in
Ross-on-Wye.
‘At first, it was once a year for a few days, but they
have got worse and worse. In a bloom, fish can’t see food. Weeds can’t grow.
That means there’s less for them to eat, and less cover for them to hide from
predators.
‘It’s not just a problem for us. Visitors come to canoe, or walk, or sit
by the river. It was always a clear paradise, but now the river often looks
lifeless.’
Maurice
Hudson, an angler who runs fisheries on a stretch of the Wye Valley, told reporters
recently: ‘The part of the river where I fish was always best in low-water
levels in spring and summer. Now the river is thick with algae at these times,
meaning it is impossible to fish. You can’t even find small creatures in the
shallows any more.’
Ask who’s to blame for this ecological catastrophe, and
you’ll generally get one of two answers.
The first villain is Powys County Council, whose
Conservative administration has close ties to the farming industry. It has
declined a mere five planning applications for IPUs in the past five years and
approved 137. The CPRW says this fact is causing ‘environmental catastrophe.’
Darrell Shepherd, who runs one of ten Powys residents’
groups who wrote to the council this month calling for a moratorium on new
chicken sheds — their request was rejected — says: ‘These are the agricultural
equivalent of factories. If I tried to build something the same size in a rural
area causing the same amount of pollution, they would laugh in my face. But if
you are going to stick animals in it, they just wave it through.’
In a statement, Powys Council said it is ‘fully aware of
its statutory duty to conserve and enhance biodiversity’ and insisted all
planning applications are ‘assessed under habitats regulations’.
The other organisation facing severe criticism is Natural
Resources Wales [NRW], the Welsh Government’s equivalent of Natural England,
which has long been nicknamed ‘not really working’ by conservationists on
account of the fact that Wales has for years suffered some of the worst
agricultural pollution levels in Britain.
It has powers to block or hinder new poultry developments
on environmental grounds but rarely uses them. By contrast, NRW’s English
counterpart has taken extensive steps in recent years to curb new IPUs over the
border.
Marc Willimont, an assistant director at Herefordshire
County Council, told a Sunday newspaper that Natural England is refusing to
sign off new building in the upper half of his county to curb pollution,
particularly around the River Lugg, a major tributary of the Wye. ‘No such
restriction seems to exist across the border in Wales,’ he said.
When I asked, Natural Resources Wales was unable to say
whether it had opposed a single application to build an IPU in the Wye
catchement area in recent years. It was also unable to tell me how many poultry
farmers — if any — it had fined or otherwise sanctioned in recent years for
breaching waste management rules by disposing of chicken manure incorrectly.
In a
statement, NRW said ‘we work closely with the agricultural industry to minimise
nutrient run-off into rivers’ and blamed recent algal blooms on low water
levels and sunny weather which ‘combine to warm water temperatures’.
The agency insisted that ‘long-term phosphate levels in
the Wye catchment have been declining’ but a spokesman was unable to say what
data this claim was based on.
In response, the WUF said that NRW changed the way it
measured phosphate levels in 2016, rendering historical comparisons meaningless
(NRW did not comment on this claim).
There is, of course, a third group of people responsible
for turning Powys into the UK’s poultry capital, with all the knock-on effects
that entails: the nation’s shoppers. In other words, you and I.
Britons eat 13 billion eggs a year and demand has soared
thanks to the lockdown baking craze, with sales at Waitrose up 50 per cent. We
also consume ever greater quantities of chicken but expect to pay as little as
£2.99 for a whole bird.
Against that backdrop, the farming industry follows the
money, and in a beautiful part of the world with cheap land and easy access to
processing facilities and major egg firms, it’s hardly surprising to see vast
chicken sheds springing up.
‘The truth is that we have no argument with chicken
farmers,’ says Simon Evans. ‘They are often very helpful indeed.’
Each year, his organisation carries out work to limit
phosphate pollution on free-range egg farms.
‘Everyone does their best. But we only have resources to
retrofit drainage on four or five farms a year.
Then, last week, Powys council approved four more massive
new chicken farms. When they already have a river that is going green.’ And so
the Wye continues to die.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.