Dear Simon,
Apologies for late reply.
Apologies for late reply.
If nothing else it is good to
have an explanation for the current conditions to pass on to fishermen.
In the Forest of Dean there are
no Forest Enterprise forestry felling operations until the end of August.
I believe it is nonsense to cause the damage during the
summer time and do not accept that there are no acidity issues.
The Ph here has undoubtedly
changed here and although I am not able to supply you with readings I presume
Severn Trent can, although their monitoring is probably so infrequent that
there are no current readings. The river is loaded with black/brown water all
the time and covered in foam. it looks like the Teifi at Cilgerran in constant
flood.
Following the year of constant filthy water in 2012 the
extensive beds of ranunculus here died out. Lis Harris from Natural England in
her received wisdom said it would come back quickly, on which occasion I looked
at her in disbelief. Yes dribs and drabs were creeping in last year and this
April. That has mostly been eaten out by the armies of geese and swans.
An effective sheet of black
polythene killed it in 2012 and the same is happening now. What
unflowered ranunculus there is has just been falling out in a yellowing
state.
In my view it is total
negligence and incompetence on the part of NRW to instruct the felling at this
time of year. I recognise the issues of land damage from the forestry plant are
likely to be less in summer when working conditions for movements are easier.
However if it is not viable or too restrictive to use that plant during winter
when the run off has a chance of being absorbed by flood water then they should
not be allowing this felling practice to proceed.
I presume the issues are:-
Winter strip felling: risks of siltation to salmon redds.
Summer strip felling: dryer harder ground less run off.
This felling in sensitive areas
should be carried out using traditional low damage felling practices not the
harvester techniques employing dinosaur sized plant..
In my view NRW and any consultees have been negligent and
incompetent in allowing this felling to take place and for it to continue given
the effects.
I believe it should be halted with immediate effect until a
way forward is put in place which does not 'pollute' the water.
As a riparian owner and a
fishery owner I expect the water coming into my fishery to be in a clear and
good fishable condition.
I for one want to see this
felling stopped until a safe practice is put in place and a stop to filthy
water damaging the environment of my fishery. I note that by damage I mean
effects which may be caused as a direct result of peat soil loaded water.
I cannot interest any fish whatsoever in a fly in these
conditions - when it clears to a couple of foot visibility of peat stained
water I start catching fish again.
That the little ranunculus that
recovered is once again dying, the river is covered in foam and it is so
coloured for most of the time that visibility is virtually nil and the fishing
is as described is sufficient for me to conclude that the damage is being done.
Yours sincerely
Don.
On 13 July 2016 at 13:15, Simon Evans <simon@wyeuskfoundation.org>
wrote:
Dear
Don,
I
can’t for sure tell you why but here are some of the things that are going on.
The
colour in the Lower Wye in late June was almost certainly as a result of run
off from asparagus and potato fields, both as a result of the short duration
very heavy rainstorms, and also from irrigated water running back in.
Also
the Irfon (and Bidno) are particularly peaty this year and we have just has a
big spate from the Upper Wye, Elan and Irfon. Almost all this water is coming
from the peaty part of the catchment. This means the main river looks
especially peaty.
The prime
suspect is the forestry:
- NRW are taking the opportunity to radically restructuring their forests, which in time will reduce acid waters and protect peat, but in the short term leads to increased peat breakdown.
- The private forest operations are in the hands of FIM, the most ruthless and profit driven of all the operators. I am suspicious but am yet to confirm that new drainage has gone in as they have been replanting.
That
is the best I can offer now, but the good news is that there do not seem to be
any additional acid issues, and peaty water is not bad for the ecosystem or
fish populations.
Simon
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.