Having been urged by Simon Evans that anglers should fish this weekend at beats such as,
Abernant, Ty Newydd, Gromain, Llangoed, Hay Castle, Whitney Court and Red Lion are all free. I would personally be happy on any of those except perhaps Hay Castle, as I have a lower tolerance of canoes than some others.
I have to say a more realistic approach was penned by another anglers. See below. I have to agree with him. With a 6 fish 6 year average, and some of the other beats far less, your taking a great leap of faith which the scenery no way makes up for. It;'s not called running the river down its called stating the facts
"Supply and demand--------------------------------------------------------------
Supply of rods should be driven by demand. Catches drive demand.
To start the ball rolling, get some catches in the book and drive up demand somebody actually has to fish these beats for Salmon. If the rods aren't coming then why not look at the supply side and either bring the prices down or look at alternative ways of selling rods: 'Spring Permit' fish any day a week until June, 8 rods max etc etc.
Take Gromain it's a lovely beat with some excellent fly water; but it's £45 a day, for a 5YA of 6 fish a Season! Granted it will have been lightly rodded, but who's seriously booking that for the first time with a sense of optimism? Add on a near 2 hour drive from anywhere west of the M50 / Severn Bridge and add on the petrol costs and it becomes just enough to make me stop and wonder if I'm just pissing away £75 and a day off for some casting practice.
However, based on what you and others also more knowledgable than me have said, the upper river should be well on this weekend. It's May there has been good water....... it maybe worth it and you'll never know unless you...........
Good luck this weekend."
The Red lion is not available on Saturday anyway. Whitney would be a decent bet though if it does drop.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See below notes on recent look at what they call alternative mitigation work. Someone is having a laugh. This shoukld be everyday EA work to meet Water Framework directive. Its not mitigation and if there is any surely it should be done on the upper river from where the mitigation stems.
As for having no money just look at the costs for what reward I wonder. has there been any assessment as to the likely benefits (As long as its more realistic than the Monnow assessment)
Looks like the boys club are at it again with snouts in the trough.
NRW
River Wye: programme of alternative
mitigation work
Note of field visit to upper Lugg and
Arrow
Date:
15th April 2015
Venue: upper Lugg and
Arrow catchments
Present:
Jason
Jones NRW
Stephen
Marsh-Smith WUF
Tony
Norman Upper Lugg &
Arrow Fisheries Association
Stuart
Smith WSA
Mike
Timmis WSFOA
Peter
Gough NRW
Apologies:
Rob Denny Monnow Rivers
Association
Simon
Evans WUF
Seth
Johnson Marshall WUF & WSFOA
David
Revill Wye LFG
Introduction
PG
introduced the purpose of this visit which was an inspection of weirs on the
Welsh reaches of the Lugg and Arrow. A
shared view of priority of tackling these barriers compared to other mitigation
activities would then be developed.
Barriers to migration
The
following weirs were inspected:-
Lugg
Boultibrooke
Weir (also known as Saw Mill). Number 26
(Lugg) on NRW listing
Concrete
baulk constructed by WUF in September 2011.
Agreed
that his facilitated salmon passage (and probably also trout), and difficulty
rating lowered.
Weir
still prevents passage of minor species, and is therefore not WFD compliant.
CONCLUSION
– NO ACTION REQUIRED UNDER AM
Boultibrooke
Bridge Weir. Number 27 (Lugg)
Weir much
lower than previously assumed, at about 0.8m.
Low
priority for salmon (and trout).
CONCLUSION
– NO ACTION REQUIRED UNDER AM
Dolley
Green Weir. Number 28 (Lugg)
Relatively
high and broad weir that will clearly obstruct salmon in range of flows.
Salmon
know to have reached this point, but no further, in recent years.
Recent
attempt by WUF to amend weir lead to structural problems and weir was
stabilised with no benefit to migration achieved.
Option
identified: interim lowering of
weir crest, to be followed by assessment of upstream bank stability and fish
migration performance.
Subsequent
weir removal may follow.
CONCLUSION
– PRIORITY 1 FOR ACTION UNDER ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION PROGRAMME
Action:- Explore
preferred option with landowner ACTION: WUF
Confirm
any heritage listing ACTION:
JJ
Confirm funding
and partnership options ACTION: PG
Arrow
Llanpica
Weir. Number 24 (Arrow)
Relatively
low head, long diagonal stone-pitched weir.
Still supporting abstraction to old fish farm.
Salmon
known to have reached this area in 2014, but failed to pass weir.
Weir is
difficult for migration.
Options
identified: EITHER construction
of half-width rock ramp, probably on LHS
OR
lowering of half of weir, probably LHS
CONCLUSION
– PRIORITY 1 FOR ACTION UNDER ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION PRIOGRAMME
Action: Confirm
whether there is extant abstraction licence ACTION JJ note there is a confirmed extant
abstraction licence here, but permitting only a 50% abstraction
Open
liaison with weir owner ACTION: WUF
Confirm
funding and partnership options ACTION: PG
Conclusion
The group
concluded that we have 2 high priority weirs for action ASA)P: Dolley Green and
Llanpica.
Prioritising works
We previously
agreed that we need to prioritise the top 3 in each of the main categories of
work.
As a
first stab:-
Work Site Approximate Cost
Barriers Dolau
Green – rock ramp £30k
Llanpica
– pre-barrage or removal £25k
Crucorney
– rock ramp £40k
KRC Upper
Ithon (JJ paper) £90k
(can be spread across several years)
Other
KRC sites £50k
- £100k
Riparian
management sites tbc £7
per metre
Instream
habitat Upper Irfon £5k
Other
sites tbc £5k
per site
The group now agrees to prioritise the
barrier works at Dolley Green and Llanpica, but to have a set of KRC sites as
reserve projects.
ACTION: ALL TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS ASAP
Next meeting
TBC
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.