An interesting and and almost unbelievable snippet from the recent LFG meeting where I understand our defender of angling interest, Mr Stephen Marsh Smith, announced that far from solving the problem of unlawful canoeing at Glasbury Bridge and below, Powys CC have actually extended the launching times at Glasbury bont by another half an hour. This was apparently done in consultation with WUF.
Is this what the Splash funding he is in receipt of from WAG for. I don't think so. The man is a nightmare and has seemingly sold us down the river once again it seems. How much longer do we have to put up with this duplicity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read below the current state of our sister river The Usk. Whilst many of the figures and estimates are just an educated guess you can see the current state of the river. River still at risk, not meeting its egg deposition or conservation targets nor likely to do so in the forseeable future. Looks certain to have 100% C& R and further method restrictions.
Juvenile densities - they no longer differentiate between fry and parr as no doubt parr numbers are falling except of course where WUF have done some habitat work -well according to Simon Evans it is. Wouldn't expect nothing less would you.?
A preliminary assessment of the status of the salmon stock in the River Usk for 2014
1.
Purpose
1.1
Each year Natural Resources Wales
(NRW) uses catch returns
from salmon rod licence holders
to assess the current
and likely future status
of stocks in the Usk and other rivers. That assessment helps determine the need for management action.
1.2
Due to the time required to obtain and
analyse licence returns, the full assessment based on the 2014 season
will not be available until April 2015, which could further delay the implementation of management action.
1.3
In November last year, the Wye & Usk Foundation used catches recorded from major Usk fisheries to predict the rod catch
declared to NRW and egg deposition for 2013. That preliminary assessment accurately predicted
a decline in the status
of the Usk salmon
stock to ‘Probably at Risk’, subsequently confirmed
in April (CEFAS/EA/NRW 2014).
1.4
This report provides similar
predictions for 2014,
with the help of NRW, to provide a preliminary assessment of the status of Usk salmon stocks,
once more enabling early initiation of management action.
2.
Estimation of the declared
rod catch and egg deposition
in
2014
2.1
The annual rod catches of salmon at Upper Llangybi, Lower Llangybi
(David Addams- Williams, pers. comm.), Llanover (WUF website), Monks wood (Helen Harrison, pers.comm.) and Merthyr Angling Association’s waters (Tony Rees, pers.comm.) have been combined
and related to the annual catches declared by licence
holders for the last five years. Together, the catches at these fisheries have comprised
a large proportion of the Usk’s rod catch, ranging from 35% in 2011 to 49% in 2010, with an average
of 45%.
|
U&L Llangybi, Llanover, Merthyr AA, Monkswood
|
Usk rod catch Declared to NRW by anglers
|
Sample as % of declared Usk catch
|
2009
|
216
|
491
|
44%
|
2010
|
284
|
580
|
49%
|
2011
|
250
|
707
|
35%
|
2012
|
483
|
1014
|
48%
|
2013
|
228
|
543
|
42%
|
2014
|
179
|
395
|
5yr
Mean: 45%
|
|
Range:
|
365-511
|
35%-49%
|
2.2
Applying that range and
average to the 2014 catch
at
these fisheries indicates that the declared rod catch for 2014 from licence holders for the whole river will be between
365 and 511, and probably about 395.
2.3
A sample of 63 rod caught salmon from Upper Llangybi
and Monkswood fisheries was used to characterise the weight distribution of salmon in
2014, i.e.
Range (lbs)
|
3-
4
|
4-
5
|
5-
6
|
6-
7
|
7-
8
|
8-
9
|
9-
10
|
10-
11
|
11-
12
|
12-
13
|
13-
14
|
14-
15
|
15-
16
|
16-
17
|
No.
|
1
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
4
|
8
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
Note: where the angler gave the weight as, say, 8 lbs, the fish was placed in
the
7-8lbs range.
2.4
Using these data, and assuming that applying recent values for factors such
as
catch & release
rate of 70% and exploitation (13% for grilse and 16% for multi-sea-winter fish), Paul Greest (NRW)(per. comm.) has estimated that egg deposition in 2014 will be between
76% and 107% of
the
Conservation Limit.
2.5
The central estimate, based on a rod catch of 395, indicates
egg deposition at 82% of the Conservation Limit,
i.e. 8.3 million eggs. This compares to
a Conservation Limit of 10.11 million
eggs (Table 23 in CEFAS/EA/NRW 2014).
2.6
It is likely that egg deposition this winter will be the worst since 2003, when it was 89% of the Conservation Limit, and possibly
the worst since the early 1990s.
3.0 Assessment of stock status
3.1
NRW has also provided
a preliminary stock assessment for this year and
prediction for 2019 using the central estimate
(as in ‘River Usk 2’ below) and also the range
for egg deposition.
River Usk2
1.6
Estimates of egg deposition, and compliance with conservation limit
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Year
3.2
Regardless of whether the highest or lowest
estimate of egg deposition is used for 2014:
·
Spawning is predicted to remain below the Conservation Limit, on average
·
The trend for egg deposition is negative
(though not statistically significant)
·
The Usk is predicted
to remain ‘Probably
At Risk’.
3.3
The shortfall in egg deposition this year, 2014,
will be about 2.1 million
eggs, equating to about 700 adult salmon of both sexes. The true rod catch for 2014 will be greater
than that declared,
NRW assumes 10% greater, i.e. about
440. So even if all rod-caught salmon
had been returned,
and survived to spawn, there would still be a shortfall this year. If the trend continues, the shortfall in 2019 is predicted
to be about 1300 salmon,
of both sexes.
3.4
The downward trend would be much more severe without
the high rod catch in 2012 which, as highlighted last year, was an
exceptionally wet season
(Mawle, 2013). The predicted status may therefore be optimistic.
3.5
Flow conditions in 2014 were poor for salmon migration and
angling in the summer though not exceptionally so, as indicated
by the heights on the gauge at Chainbridge below.
Flows ere similar
in 2002 when the Usk rod
catch was 616 salmon (data courtesy of NRW) and egg deposition twice as great as that predicted
here for 2014.
Gauge Data courtesy
of NRW
3.6
Abstraction, especially at night from the lower reaches
at gauge heights
less than 0.7m, would have reduced the number
of salmon entering
the Usk, though not as much as in many years. The model developed by the Wye & Usk Foundation indicates that in 2002, abstraction reduced the number
of salmon entering the Usk before
the end of September
by about 12 percent, and
reducing the total run by more than 5 percent
(John Lawson, pers. comm.). A similar impact this year would reduce the number of salmon
spawning by about 100 or so.
4.0 The need for action
4.1
Under the EU
Habitats Directive, action is also required
for the Usk to be in favourable condition, or moving
towards it, in 2015 as a Special
Area of Conservation under
the Habitats Directive. The Usk salmon
stock is a primary
reason for designation of the river.
The Directive
requires a precautionary approach to be taken. This preliminary assessment suggests that by 2015, the salmon feature will not only still have an unfavourable status but be in decline.
4.2
This assessment shows that it is very unlikely that there has been any improvement in stock status since last year. It is not known if any new action has been taken as yet by NRW to respond to the decline or last year’s
recommendations for action.
4.3
The latest survey of juvenile salmon densities in 2013 (Sophie
Gott, NRW 2014) found that about 1/3 of sites have densities of salmon fry or parr which
are
statistically significantly lower than would be expected
(slightly more so in the case of fry than parr).
This tends to support concerns
about levels of egg deposition. Despite this,
there were indications that
where work had been done to improve
access and/or habitat, juvenile salmon
densities had improved.
Simon Evans, WUF (pers. comm.).
4.4
Most electrofishing sites are on
tributaries or the upper river which is where fully quantitative electrofishing is practical. However, the main river provides
a large, if not the majority of juvenile nursery
area and even now salmon spawn all the way down
to the head of tide. Sophie Gott (2014) noted that densities
of fry in the main river may
have declined since the 1990s,
as indicated in
Figure 14a, below, from her report. While these data are imprecise, if there has been a
decline in the quality
of habitat in the middle and lower reaches of
the
main river, it could have far
greater consequences for smolt production than indicated by the standard
survey sites.
4.5
While Welsh Water has voluntarily adopted a slightly improved abstraction regime
at Prioress Mill in the lower
reaches, it was still taking up to
a quarter
of the river flow at night in 2014, which under lower
flows is when salmon
generally migrate. This could have been avoided
without jeopardising public
water supply.
4.6
Although many Usk anglers do return most, if not all, of the salmon they catch, others do not. Furthermore, stale salmon are being killed
which have little merit as food. Furthermore, the proportion of salmon,
as declared to NRW, may be optimistic. Those anglers
who disregard the legal requirement to make a catch return
may be more inclined
to ignore requests
to return salmon.
4.7
In October, the Usk
Fishing Association circulated this picture of a stale, pale-fleshed hen fish from Jonathan Carthew who runs the Black Mountain
Smokery in Crickhowell. He asked: ‘Could you send
this picture out to all members suggesting
that it is not worth killing fish this late in the season as they are
full of eggs or milt and are inedible
even when smoked? I am seeing far too many like
this these last couple of days.’
5.0 Recommendations
5.1
Welsh Government policy, as described to the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (NASCO, 2013),
is that action
should be sufficient for spawning escapement to:
·
have a consistently positive
trend;
·
be ‘Probably Not at Risk’
of failing the management
target within 5 years; and
·
deliver the longer term goal, within 10 years, of being ‘Not at Risk’.
5.2
Outstanding environmental issues affecting the salmon stock should be reviewed
as
a matter of urgency
and prompt effective
action taken
to address them.
5.2 The impact of abstractions on both smolt and adult salmon migration, as well as juvenile production is one such issue. An improved
abstraction regime has been developed by the Wye & Usk Foundation to reduce this impact, working with
the
major abstractors, Welsh Water and the Canal & Rivers Trust,
as well as NRW. This new regime is
expected to be endorsed, in large measure, by NRW by the end of the year. Even if new licences or operating
manuals cannot be fully implemented for 2015, NRW should request Welsh
Water and the
Canal & Rivers Trust to reduce
abstraction voluntarily in line with the new regimes, as far as practical.
5.2
If implemented fully, the models developed by John Lawson (WUF),
indicate that the annual salmon
run into the river
would be increased by about 7 percent on
average, maybe more. If the annual run currently averages 4000 to 5000 salmon, that would be an
extra 300 or so salmon
on the redds,
assuming that most survive to spawn.
5.3
The improved abstraction regime would
also mean that a greater proportion of salmon
run during the fishing
season and the impact on rod catch is likely
to be substantially greater.
That could give fishing interests a distorted
impression of the benefits
for the salmon stock as a whole.
5.4
More effective mandatory fishing controls
should be introduced as soon as possible to ensure
not only that a larger proportion of salmon
are returned alive but also without reducing
their chances of surviving
to spawn. More attention should
be given to both matters.
The fishing techniques currently allowed
on the Usk are likely
to result in a high level of mortality.
Gargan et al (2015) report that only 55 percent
of salmon caught
on Flying Cs survived
to spawn, compared with 98 percent
for those caught on
fly.
5.5
The policy
for rivers, such as the Usk, which are assessed
as ‘Probably at Risk‘ of failing the management objective) and
the trend is down…
‘…. and C&R rate < 90%, then voluntary catch and release (C&R) will be promoted for 1 year. If this fails to significantly improve
C&R rates, mandatory
C&R or closure of the fishery
will be considered. Protected rivers
such as SACs (Special Areas of Conservation)
are given particular emphasis.’ From Annex 7 in CEFAS/EA/NRW (2014).
Had last year’s recommendation to go out to consultation
been acted on (Mawle 2013), NRW would have been ready now to introduce measures for 2015 and advise fishery owners clubs
and anglers well in advance.
References
CEFAS/EA/NRW (2013). Annual assessment of salmon stocks and fisheries
in England and Wales 2013. 152pp. http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/SalmonReport2013-final.pdf
Gargan, P.G., Stafford, T., Økland, F., Thorstad, E.B. (2015).
Survival of wild Atlantic
salmon (Salmo salar) after catch
and release angling
in three Irish rivers.
Fisheries Research 161, 252–260.
Gott, S. (2013). Usk Catchment
2013 Fishery Survey Report.
Report TM/SE_A&R/14/18. Natural Resources Wales. 24pp
Mawle, G.W. (2013).
A preliminary assessment of the status of the salmon stock in the River Usk for 2013. Wye & Usk Foundation. 4pp.
NASCO (2013). NASCO Implementation Plan for the period 2013-18.
EU–UK (England and Wales).
Guy Mawle, Wye & Usk Foundation 15 November
2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.