Fish remain scarce and what there are still seem to be pushing through the lower beats though in all honesty they are not appearing in middle or upper beats to any great extent. Having said that if you do get one it's likely to be a quality fish.
LATEST
A somewhat better day today with a fish of 17 1/2lbs from Ballingham to Caledon Richardson -flying/C
Three today from Ingeston. Two to regular rod Glyn Slade at 14 and 12lbs and a first salmon to young Oliver Ruthuen of 14lbs. Oliver is the third generation of his family to catch fish at Ingeston with gillie Lyn Cobley. Two of the three fish were sea liced so seemingly still running through the lower beats. Surely as levels continue to fall they will soon come into their own.
12lb fish from Courtfield yesterday to Jon Taylor
The latest WUF Newsletter, see below, is the latest and perhaps best example of spin and misinformation they have yet issued. For a start it appears they have been, using the royal 'WE', instrumental in stopping the Severn Barrage. Really !!.
On top of that, having stocked the Wye for many years they now do an about turn on the stocking issue hiding behind a spurious habitat directive where one is supposed to prove 'conclusively' that stocking poses no risk. The previous Wye Owners Association Chairman has two smolts ponds on his own land and yet WUF, who they pump money to each year, now turns around and refuses to support them.. Extraordinary is it not. Why not prove first that stocking does do harm and then stop it. Stocking has been going on for a hundred years, one would have thought there might be some proof one way or another by now. As we still have stocks of salmon in the UK clearly it's unlikely to have done any har, probably the opposite in fact.
They then take a swipe at WSA- wonder what they fear from that area -perhaps the wide support, financial and otherwise , being garnered by them. WSA and RWGA have never said that stocking and nothing else is the only way to recover the WYE. Another direct lie. We have always said that due to low stocks making best use of the fish available and stocking parr/smolts into 'Claimed Habitat Restoration' was a good way forward until stocks recovered. SNR was a stage further still.
They then tell us that the Wye has improved above the EA's 'AT RISK' status. This is either a blatant lie or a printing error as other information below shows it has clearly not. This on top of the recent poor Usk survey.
They even copy the WSA with a couple of free rod days. Oh dear.
See this information from the EA today. Note too that the Taff has been recovered principally by stocking and the Cleddau receives stock too and the rivers would have benefitted from Estuary Putcher and Irish Drift net removal.
The key features set out in the
stats table are these:-
·
In 2013 the Wye continued to fail to achieve
its annual conservation limit
·
The trend in the stock is improving, but
that is statistically ‘uncertain’
·
The probability of an upward trend is 63%
(so it is more likely than not that the stock is
improving)
·
We forecast that the stock will ‘advance’ to
the “probably at risk” category by 2018
·
The Wye is 1 of only 3 rivers in Wales that
is currently forecast to show an improvement (the others are the Taff and the
Cleddau)
·
The shortfall of eggs (as a 20%ile) is 23.1
million, compared to a 2013 deposition estimate of 15.49
million
Also note the outcome of
regulation of the Severn Estuary net and trap fisheries.
I conclude that there are more
grounds for optimism than pessimism, but that the position remains worrying.
There is more work to do.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So who is right. You can make your own mind up but the WUF statement is typical and the very reason why over the years the have engendered so much hostility towards their operation in the way it spews out information which on reflection turns out not to be substantiated. See more;
River Wye salmon
stock assessment, incorporating 2013 data
April 2014
Note – for the first time, as as agreed at Wye LFG, the
target incorporates potential spawning and recruitment areas of the River
Monnow sub-catchment.

River
|
Wye
|
||||||||
CURRENT
compliance status
|
At risk
|
||||||||
PREDICTED
(+5yr) compliance status
|
Prob at
risk
|
||||||||
Trend
(based on difference between current and +5yr 20%ile)
|
Improving
|
||||||||
Probbabiltiy
of upward trend
|
0.6328
|
||||||||
Trend
status
|
Uncertain
|
||||||||
CL - as
Log[egg deposition, millions]
|
1.586
|
||||||||
CL - as
egg deposition, millions
|
38.57
|
million
eggs
|
|||||||
CURRENT
20%ile - as Log[egg deposition, millions]
|
1.190
|
||||||||
CURRENT
20%ile - as egg deposition, millions
|
15.49
|
million
eggs
|
|||||||
CURRENT
20%ile shortfall/surplus [millions of eggs] - absolute
|
-23.1
|
million
eggs
|
|||||||
PREDICTED
(+5yr) 20%ile - as Log[egg deposition, millions]
|
1.228
|
||||||||
PREDICTED
(+5yr) 20%ile - as egg deposition, millions
|
16.90
|
million
eggs
|
|||||||
PREDICTED
(+5yr) 20%ile shortfall/surplus [millions
of eggs] - absolute
|
-21.7
|
![]()
|
Click here
to unsubscribe or manage your subscription

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.